Allergy Capital

Vaccine safety in patients with egg allergy

Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) vaccines are produced in egg fibroblast cultures, and contain miniscule quantities of contaminating egg protein. Early reports of allergic reactions to MMR vaccine in some egg-allergic children led to premature advice that this vaccine should used with caution.

Updated 20 April 2000



Influenza and Yellow Fever vaccines are grown in egg cultures. It is not unreasonable to be concerned about the possibility that residual egg protein may induce adverse reactions in patients with known egg induced anaphylaxis.


Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) vaccines, however, are different. They are produced in egg fibroblast cultures, and contain miniscule quantities of contaminating egg protein. Early reports of systemic allergic reactions to MMR vaccine in some egg-allergic children led to advice that the use of the vaccine in egg allergic children should be undertaken with caution. This led to the establishment of "high risk" vaccination clinics and recommendations that egg allergic patients be skin tested with the vaccine before administration. Those with positive tests either had the vaccine withheld, or administered in graded doses to "desensitize" them.


In retrospect, the presence of allergic reactions to a vaccine in some children with egg allergy is hardly surprising, given that around 0.5 per cent of children are estimated to develop egg allergy. Subsequent reports, however (summarized in the New England Journal of Medicine 1995, 332: 1262-1266), suggest that even in known egg allergic subjects, the risk of an adverse reaction to vaccination is less than 1 per cent (only 2/1227 reacted). In fact, the majority of patients with immediate allergic reactions to MMR were not allergic to egg.


A potential explanation has been offered by a number of papers over the last 4 years suggesting that the vast majority of those suffering from immediate reactions to MMR are allergic to the gelatin stabilizer, added to some live vaccines to enhance stability. Not only are these subjects not allergic to egg, but the majority have had (or go on to develop) allergic reactions to oral gelatin used in products such as fruit gums (J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996; 98: 1058-61).


Gelatin is classified "generally regarded as safe" for human consumption by the US FDA & is considered to be relatively hypoallergenic & non-immunogenic. It has a variety of therapeutic uses including collagen implants for plastic surgery, gelatin sponges for surgical haemostasis, colloid solutions (Haemacel), dissolvable contact lenses, as a stabilizing agent in some vaccines (such as MMR) & as a binding and coating agent in tablets and capsules. It is also used in photographic emulsions, glues, matches, cosmetics, and shampoos. Indeed, contact urticaria has been reported with some of these products. Gelatin is also a common constituent of many processed foods including confectionery, food thickeners, dips, glazes, icing, soups, chilled dairy products (e.g. yogurt, mayonnaise, mousse, ice-cream, cheeses), in smallgoods (e.g. sausage coatings, salami, tinned hams, pate) and is sometimes used to clarify fruit juices and wine.


At this time, there is little evidence to support the widespread concern that infants with food allergy to egg are at "special risk" of reactions to vaccines. Nevertheless, any vaccine at any time may induce anaphylaxis and the availability of resuscitative equipment is still required.

See also an Editorial in the BMJ dated 1 April 2000.